<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does Wi-Fi stand for?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.16thletter.com/index.php/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/</link>
	<description>thoughts on how the Internet intersects with work, play &#038; life</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: THUMPER</title>
		<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/#comment-121407</link>
		<dc:creator>THUMPER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.16thletter.com/?p=478#comment-121407</guid>
		<description>I'll be DAMNED!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be DAMNED!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MixtLupus</title>
		<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/#comment-69545</link>
		<dc:creator>MixtLupus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.16thletter.com/?p=478#comment-69545</guid>
		<description>As I've had a number of visitors come to my site since you credited me on the post I figured I'd return the favour and have added a link to your site on my right side advertisements (which comes up when no paid adverts exist) :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve had a number of visitors come to my site since you credited me on the post I figured I&#8217;d return the favour and have added a link to your site on my right side advertisements (which comes up when no paid adverts exist) :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelly</title>
		<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/#comment-68435</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.16thletter.com/?p=478#comment-68435</guid>
		<description>thanks for this article!
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this article!<br />
:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobile mike</title>
		<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/#comment-64304</link>
		<dc:creator>mobile mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.16thletter.com/?p=478#comment-64304</guid>
		<description>Tnx 4 the 411 what wi-fi stand 4. I thought it was Word-Interference - Free-Internet. Lol..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tnx 4 the 411 what wi-fi stand 4. I thought it was Word-Interference - Free-Internet. Lol..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/#comment-58539</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.16thletter.com/?p=478#comment-58539</guid>
		<description>The articles that MixtLupus refers to are old. The alliance does not advertise WiFi as wireless fidelity anymore. You can check the glossary of that website if you have doubts. It is not broken out like WiMAX, which actually does mean something. The alliance abandoned wireless fidelity very early on.

Melissa,
You should have stood by your research or at least look into Mix's claims before claiming that he/she is a reliable source. Just like you shouldn't trust what I say until you look it up yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The articles that MixtLupus refers to are old. The alliance does not advertise WiFi as wireless fidelity anymore. You can check the glossary of that website if you have doubts. It is not broken out like WiMAX, which actually does mean something. The alliance abandoned wireless fidelity very early on.</p>
<p>Melissa,<br />
You should have stood by your research or at least look into Mix&#8217;s claims before claiming that he/she is a reliable source. Just like you shouldn&#8217;t trust what I say until you look it up yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Chang</title>
		<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/#comment-47205</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Chang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.16thletter.com/?p=478#comment-47205</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments - especially for pointing me in the right direction, @MixtLupus and @Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments - especially for pointing me in the right direction, @MixtLupus and @Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaphod4269</title>
		<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/#comment-47176</link>
		<dc:creator>zaphod4269</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.16thletter.com/?p=478#comment-47176</guid>
		<description>I always wondered why people called it wifi....  I always called it 802.11b when it first came out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wondered why people called it wifi&#8230;.  I always called it 802.11b when it first came out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wow</title>
		<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/#comment-47158</link>
		<dc:creator>wow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.16thletter.com/?p=478#comment-47158</guid>
		<description>no, the regular term for Wi-Fi mean wireless fidelity, the wifi alliance has no meaning behind it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, the regular term for Wi-Fi mean wireless fidelity, the wifi alliance has no meaning behind it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MixtLupus</title>
		<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/#comment-47135</link>
		<dc:creator>MixtLupus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.16thletter.com/?p=478#comment-47135</guid>
		<description>The Wi-Fi Alliance (http://www.wifialliance.org/) define their trademark as short for Wireless-Fidelity in the same way that Hi-Fi stood for High Fidelity

This is listed on the knowledge base of their site but you have to be an authorised Wi-Fi distributor to see the full article but if you search the KB for fidelity you will see part of the article in question</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wi-Fi Alliance (http://www.wifialliance.org/) define their trademark as short for Wireless-Fidelity in the same way that Hi-Fi stood for High Fidelity</p>
<p>This is listed on the knowledge base of their site but you have to be an authorised Wi-Fi distributor to see the full article but if you search the KB for fidelity you will see part of the article in question</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2008/08/05/what-does-wi-fi-stand-for/#comment-44156</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.16thletter.com/?p=478#comment-44156</guid>
		<description>Thanks, this helped me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, this helped me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
