<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One problem with Internet publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.16thletter.com/index.php/2009/03/16/one-problem-with-internet-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2009/03/16/one-problem-with-internet-publishing/</link>
	<description>thoughts on how the Internet intersects with work, play &#038; life</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.16thletter.com/2009/03/16/one-problem-with-internet-publishing/#comment-34680</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.16thletter.com/?p=603#comment-34680</guid>
		<description>Great point! I have noticed another problem too (which can also be found in print publications). Many publications which don't have too much popularity will come up with stories in which there isn't 1% truth just to get some interesting material for visitors. It's sad that people don't realize that this way they are destroying their reputation before they even got it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point! I have noticed another problem too (which can also be found in print publications). Many publications which don&#8217;t have too much popularity will come up with stories in which there isn&#8217;t 1% truth just to get some interesting material for visitors. It&#8217;s sad that people don&#8217;t realize that this way they are destroying their reputation before they even got it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
